GUIs are so pervasive in today’s computing and development environment that some people have never seriously used an alternative method of interacting with a computer.
Yet I see so many places where the GUI is inappropriate and just plain counterproductive.
When developing a system, I do everything I can in an emacs shell.
Apart from the advantage of the powerful editing and searching facilities available, the biggest advantage this gives is in capturing a time ordered history of stimulus and response.
While experimenting and/or learning with a system under development, you are going to try a bunch of commands. Having history there means you can search back through results for things of note, snarf a chunk of output and filter it to hide the chaff, or sort it, or post-process it into a formatted report, or plot it in a graphic, or whatever.
This is especially powerful for working with dynamic languages, where you interact with your system as you are extending it. Once you’ve achieved something significant, you can simply cut and paste the command sequence into a permanent script, or a makefile, or whatever.
And not least, you also have text you can paste into a buffer for documentation. You may need to provide information to co-developers, or customers. Or you may need to do the same or similar thing in a week’s time. I any case, you can just look at the transcript doc to see the detail of how it was done.
I’ll often issue the odd ‘date‘ command during the interactive process, just to give some documentation on how long something took to run or how long it took me to work something out.
To do the same things with a GUI, you would need a lot of screen captures, or you need to write some inane sequence like
select menu blah, in the dialog check options blah and blah, then press button blah, then select menu blah…
Although the problem with that is the danger of missing a step or getting something out of order. So to do it properly, you really need to video capture the process.
I can’t stand videos when a text document would suffice. You see more and more of this now on everything from news sites to on-line tutorials. You go to a web site, and even if the item is technical, there is a good chance that the link is for a video of a presentation, complete with annoying ums and aahs and errs… It’s beyond me why anyone would prefer this to a text.
And the plain audio transcript is just as bad. Sure, it doesn’t waste as much bandwidth to download, but it still wastes time to listen to. That might be fine for entertainment, but it’s a waste of time for documentation.
Now, please note that I didn’t say I don’t like graphics, and I’m not saying that a high res display + mouse isn’t a boost to productivity. For sure, graphical presentation can be very helpful in visualizing data or processes.
The problem I have is with the current obsession with using a graphical metaphor everywhere, which means for processes which are far more efficiently handled with simple text.